Monday, February 23, 2009

REALTORS landlocked


1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
SLIPPERY GROUND

REALTORS landlocked
The Economic Times, February 22, 2009, Page 1

DLF, Unitech, Emaar MGF, Omaxe, BPTP freeze land acquisitions as values dip

Neha Dewan & Aman Dhall NEW DELHI

THERE was a time when real estate biggies were literally banking on land. Huge land banks were considered an invaluable asset to flaunt aggressively when selling projects or raising money. But today things have changed and the benchmark of the valuation of these companies — the land bank — is coming back to haunt them. Leading real estate developers across the country — DLF, Unitech, Emaar MGF, Omaxe, BPTP and Hiranandani Developers — have all put a freeze on their ambitious and aggressive land acquisition spree. Also, in some cases they are even trying to give back the land they had acquired. The unproductive nature of land banks coupled with erosion in notional value means that the most prized possession of real estate majors is languishing in the slowdown.

SundayET dug out some data on land banks of the top real estate companies and found that the current kitty of DLF stands at approximately 13,055 acres while that of Unitech is around 14,000 acres. Omaxe has 3,700 acres as its land holding while BPTP has 2,000 acres. According to a real estate consultant, who didn’t wish to be named, value of land prices have dropped by almost 30% since July last year, when they had peaked. By that estimate, assuming a correction of 30%, DLF’s land value stands at Rs 1,272 cr against Rs 1,817 cr standing in its balance sheet in March ‘08. Similarly, Unitech’s land value is priced at Rs 316 cr at current market prices, as compared to its value of Rs 451 cr in March’08.

Most developers, however, are not willing to concede that land banks have lost lustre. Says Sanjay Chandra MD of Unitech Group: “It depends on how you have acquired the land. We didn’t participate in open auctions. Most of our land is directly acquired from either land owners or from government auctions. Hence the cost is on the lower side. We are not burdened with any of the land parcels as the FSI cost of all our land bank is sub Rs 200 per sq ft.” But denials apart, developers such as DLF, Unitech and BPTP are shying away from mega land deals signed during the real estate boom. This asset class is, in fact, especially pinching those developers who acquired land at various auctions at heavily escalated costs.

BPTP, which hogged the limelight for the costliest land deal in Noida, surrendered a part of the land parcel earlier this month. Last year, the developer had bagged a 95-acre plot at Noida in an auction for a princely sum of Rs 5,006 cr. However, foreseeing difficulties in executing the project, the developer only retained part of the land. The case is similar with other developers, many of whom have withdrawn from key projects which would have ensured availability of large tracts of land for them. For instance, DLF recently gave up the Rs 5,000 cr Dankuni project in West Bengal and a multi-crore convention centre project in Delhi’s Dwarka.

Others like Omaxe are looking at a shift in strategy of the current situation. “Currently, we have around 3,700 acres of land. Now we are not acquiring more land, so the strategy is to develop the acquired land first,” says Omaxe Group chairman and managing director Rohtas Goel. Valuation of land is not the only problem. It’s also got to do with availability of funds for developing the land.

No comments: